mbox series

[0/3] Extend u-boot-script for DT overlays

Message ID 20230904055133.1851073-1-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com
Headers show
Series Extend u-boot-script for DT overlays | expand

Message

MOESSBAUER, Felix Sept. 4, 2023, 5:51 a.m. UTC 
This series re-proposes the reverted u-boot patches 60575d11 and
a2e734a4, as the corresponding discussions now have been finished.

In addition, p1 adds a comment about the special handling of the
OVERLAYS u-boot variable. It does not contain any functional
changes to the original patchset.

The series has been rebased onto next.

Best regards,
Felix Moessbauer

Felix Moessbauer (3):
  add comment about content of u-boot OVERLAYS var
  u-boot-script: add support to use builtin dt
  use builtin DT for nanopi-neo target

 .../lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in        |  4 ++--
 .../u-boot-script/files/u-boot-script           |  3 +++
 .../u-boot-script/files/update-u-boot-script    | 17 +++++++++++++----
 .../lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs-u-boot.py     |  3 +++
 4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Comments

Jan Kiszka Sept. 4, 2023, 6:05 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 04.09.23 07:51, Felix Moessbauer wrote:
> This series re-proposes the reverted u-boot patches 60575d11 and
> a2e734a4, as the corresponding discussions now have been finished.
> 
> In addition, p1 adds a comment about the special handling of the
> OVERLAYS u-boot variable. It does not contain any functional
> changes to the original patchset.
> 
> The series has been rebased onto next.
> 
> Best regards,
> Felix Moessbauer
> 
> Felix Moessbauer (3):
>   add comment about content of u-boot OVERLAYS var
>   u-boot-script: add support to use builtin dt
>   use builtin DT for nanopi-neo target
> 
>  .../lib/wic/canned-wks/nanopi-neo.wks.in        |  4 ++--
>  .../u-boot-script/files/u-boot-script           |  3 +++
>  .../u-boot-script/files/update-u-boot-script    | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  .../lib/wic/plugins/source/rootfs-u-boot.py     |  3 +++
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 

Looks good to me now. My question on patch 2 shouldn't block things.

Jan